Traditional Western blotting can be time consuming because protein samples must be extracted and the electrophoresis and transfer steps must be conducted before antibody binding and detection can be carried out. When size information isn’t required, dot or slot blotting can save time by bypassing the electrophoresis step. With the addition of a special apparatus, many more samples can be analyzed on one blot compared to a traditional Western, which somewhat increases throughput. However, before dot or slot blotting, protein extracts must be prepared from each cell type or condition being assessed.
ELISA (enzyme-linked immunoassay) provides a high-throughput approach to quantifying the presence of a protein or other antigen in a sample. ELISA relies on antibodies specific to the protein or antigen of interest coating the bottom of the wells of a 96- or 384-well plate to quickly capture the target when samples are added to the wells. However, an ELISA also requires extracting proteins from the cells of interest which increases the time to obtain results, and also introduces the potential to lose or alter the antigen of interest during the cell harvesting, lysing, and other extraction steps.
Figure 2 from BiteSize Bio provides a graphical comparison of in-cell Westerns, traditional Western blots, and ELISAs.
Read more: When to use ELISA vs Western blot