How to Normalize Western Blots to Total Protein
And why normalizing to a housekeeping protein can lead you astray
Why Normalize to Total Protein?
The common practice for getting quantitative/semi-quantitative data from western blots has been to normalize your band of interest to the signal from a housekeeping protein, the assumption being that being essential, the abundance of specific housekeeping proteins would be invariant across tissues and conditions. As Christian Moritz succinctly states in a 2017 Proteomics review1:
“Over the past two decades, it became clear that this assumption is wrong.”
Since as early as 20142, scientists have been concerned about the use of housekeeping proteins for normalizing western blots. At that time, a number of studies showed that many of the proteins commonly used for normalization, such as GAPDH, tubulin, and actin, are expressed at levels that can vary between tissue types and experimental conditions. The implications for past western blot studies is staggering, and it’s clear that moving forward researchers either need to use another normalization method to get accurate, reliable, and reproducible quantitative western blot data or else exhaustively verify that the abundance of the protein being used for normalization remains invariant across the tested conditions and is present at similar levels as the protein-of-interest.
Another objection to using housekeeping proteins is the observation that many of them are present in much higher abundance than the protein-of-interest and, thus, are likely to be outside of the linear dynamic range of the blot1.
Total Protein Normalization is Now the New Normal
The emerging consensus on the best way to normalize western blots is to normalize to total protein. Many journals have embraced total protein normalization (TPN) and some, such as the Journal of Biological Chemistry, even require authors to use TPN when publishing quantitative data from western blots or else to validate the use of their housekeeping protein3, 4.
An overview of the Total Protein Stains (TPS) and the TPN workflow
There are a range of total protein stains (TPS) to choose from (see Mortiz1 for a nice overview of different TPS options). The TPS you choose will affect the complexity of the TPN workflow, and the important factors to consider when choosing a TPS include:
- Dynamic range
- Detection limits
- Visualization method
- Staining time
- Visualization time
- Consistency across tissues and experimental conditions
- Compatibility with antibody-based detection
Not all stains are alike and some stains are easier to use and more accurate than others. For example, there are stains which are used on the protein gel, which sounds straight-forward but can impact the efficiency of transfer to the membrane and, thus, quantitation and reproducibility. Other stains are used after transfer so will (obviously) have no impact on transfer efficiency for better accuracy and reproducibility. But if your visualization instrument is limited to two channels for detection, you will need to strip and re-probe the blot to evaluate multiple proteins, which does reduce accuracy and reproducibility.
The TPN workflow using AzureRed Total Protein Stain
At Azure™ Biosystems, we are dedicated to developing products that have a large positive impact on a scientist’s work while having a minimal impact on a scientist’s workflow. Our AzureRed Total Protein Stain is one example. With minimal disruption to a typical western blot workflow—there’s an additional wash/incubation step before membrane blocking—you can easily stain for (and normalize to) total protein. The process is:
- Simple—AzureRed is a reversible stain that is compatible with downstream antibody-based detection
- Consistent—AzureRed delivers a signal that’s reproducible and unaffected by tissue-type and experimental conditions
- Accurate—AzureRed is linear over a wide dynamic range (> 3-log) for robust quantitation
- Flexible—AzureRed can be used with fluorescently-labeled antibodies as well as chemiluminescent detection systems
The TPN workflow using AzureRed Total Protein Stain
(Left Panel) AzureRed is imaged simultaneously with three proteins of interest. Imaged on the Sapphire Biomolecular Imager. (Right Panel) AzureRed has a wider linear dynamic range compared to common housekeeping proteins.
The workflow is simple and adds minimal time to the western blot protocol, and excitation is via the 520 nm/Cy3 channel, keeping NIR channels available for detection of multiple proteins without needing to strip and re-probe the blot.
AzureRed Total Protein Staining Protocol
Note that this is an abbreviated protocol. You can find the full protocol including how to use AzureRed for staining gels and how to remove AzureRed stain (AzureRed is a reversible stain) by ordering AzureRed Total Protein Stain or by downloading our Western Blotting Guidebook.
- Following transfer, wash blot for 5 min in water.
- Proceed to PVDF (2) or Nitrocellulose (3) protocol.
- 2a. Staining
- Place blot protein side down in Stain Solution
- Stain blot with gentle rocking for 15–30 min
- 2b. Acidification
- Place blot in Fix Solution and incubate with gentle rocking for 5 min.
- 2c. Wash
- Rinse blot 3 times with 100% ethanol for 2–3 min each, until green background on blot has been completely removed
- 2d. Drying
- Hang blot from a peg or dry on wire mesh to allow blot to dry evenly. Allow blot to dry completely before imaging
- Mortiz CP. Tubulin or Not Tubulin: Heading Toward Total Protein Staining as Loading Control in Western Blots. Proteomics. 2017 Oct; 17(20). PMID: 28941183 (includes
link to free full text).
- Ghosh R, Gilda JE, Gomes AV. The necessity of and strategies for improving confidence in the accuracy of western blots. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2014 Oct;11(5):549-60. PMCID: PMC4791038.
- Collecting and presenting data. The Journal of Biological Chemistry website. http://jbcresources.asbmb.org/collecting-and-presenting-data#blot. Accessed February 4, 2019.
- Fosang AJ and Colbran RJ. Transparency Is the Key to Quality. J Biol Chem. Dec. 11 2015. 290(50). 29692–29694. PMCID: PMC4705984.